Nancy Pelosi became a Republican ! #sarc

Obama assured his minions, like the KosKids, that evil RethugliKKKans would stop calling the unaffordable care act obamacare:






However, a funny thing happened on the way to Unicorn Utopia,

 it's the DemocRATS who've changed the name to protect the guilty:






to the point where Nancy Pelosi,  the woman who had to pass the bill to find out what was in it:




Stalinistically wishes to delete ThoughtCrimes from peoples' memories:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi corrected a reporter Thursday who called Democrats’ health care law “Obamacare.” “First of all, it’s called the ‘Affordable Care Act,’

@JohnKerry vs Swift Boat Vets for Truth

@TheDemocrats  are engaging in Stalinistic revisionist history, as per usual, by trying to coin the neologism "swiftboating," which they define as "lying, baseless character assassination." However, as Accuracy in Media points out, the progressives are engaged in psychological projection.  Hence, when Pelosi accuses GOP of wanting to infect children with E.Coli vs Heinz promoted Pure Food Laws; when Obama accuses GOP of wanting dirty air and dirty water vs Nixon's EPA; when Reid accuses Romney of tax evasion and corruption vs Reid's own graft, they are really JohnKerrying vs SwiftBoating their political opposition. To untangle the etymology,  here is some actual historical context.


In faux Cherokee Elizabeth Warren-speak, many moons ago, on the shores of Massachusetts, by the shining big sea waters, lived a haughty supercilious schmo who desired to become head honcho over all the land. He saw that a guy with the same initial did so by joining the US Navy, serving in combat, writing a book about his escapades, and turning said book into a movie starring Cliff Robertson.  John  "Lurch" Kerry decided to cut and paste JFK's resume onto his own, but ended the arc of his career by following the path of another Robertson  movie, "Charly".  Kerry actually served in Vietnam, filled out the paperwork for three purple hearts, which allowed him to cut his tour of duty short.  Kerry, of course, expected to return home to a hero's welcome, but, instead, found a bunch of dope smoking hippies burning American flags. Being the unprincipled weathercock that he is, Kerry decided to pivot in the wind and turn against his former comrades in arms. He became spokesschmuck for the Winter Soldiers and testified before Congress, smearing everyone in the military, calling them worse than Genghis Khan, apparently unconcerned that he was alienating the Mongolian American vote, who greatly esteem Khan's memory with both statues and beer.

It was proven that a number of so-called Winter Soldiers didn't serve in the military, let alone in combat. However, giving them the benefit of the doubt, which I don't, we're led to believe that Lurch, who so fastidiously dotted his i's an crossed his t's to secure his get out of Nam medals, couldn't find the time to file paperwork with JAG to document alleged violations of the UCMJ real time.

Compare and contrast Kerry's retroactive smear campaign with the valour and integrity of Hugh Thompson who stopped the My Lai massacre. Hence, Kerry tried to play both sides against the middle by cribbing both Kennedy's and Thompson's resumes and coopting their laurels for his own.

Fast forward to 2004. Kerry decides to run president. In the interim, Kerry had doubled down as his anti-American military smear campaign, whilst seeking  a rapprochement with the VietCong, earning him a place of honor in the Commie museum of helpful Commie collaborators. Current and former servicemembers weren't interested in this Yankee Doodle Yo-Yo becoming our commander in chief. They exercised their 1st Amendment rights, just as he had done decades earlier, questioning HIS honor and integrity.  They pointed out inconsistencies in his record, for which he couldn't account.  The Dems, both with and without media bylines, were taken aback that uppity proles would ever question their DNC-appointed betters.  From the progs' POV, Kerry had only stated the self evident and obvious, that all US military personnel are walking war criminal baby killers and are guilty until proven innocent.

To recap, Kerry clearly lied about most of his story, as per usual in the party of Joe "Plagiarize Kinnock" Biden and Barack "Composite Characters" Obama.  Swift Boat vets called him out on his unctuous weaselness.  The Dems psychologically projected their perfidy, turned facts upside down and inside out to characterize the story as Kerry telling "truth to power" and the evil Genghis Khan loving RethugliKKKans as smearing poor Lurch out of spite.



So, in conclusion, the progs are doing what Saul Alinskyites always do: making baseless accusations against political opponents. The Obamaites are JohnKerrying vs SwiftBoating Romney. The Special Ops guys are following the proud tradition of the swift boaters who hold smirking, smug, sarcastic, snide, snarky Kos Kids accountable for their own words and actions.

@NancyPelosi loved #Assad in 2007

Syrian murderous dictator, Assad, demonstrating how he will personally garrote his political enemies to then US Speaker of the House, Rep Nancy Pelosi (D- Californistan)

Rep. Nancy Pelosi gushed over Syrian dictator, Assad, back in 2007 when she was Speaker, for the reason cartoonists illustrated, purely domestic partisan reasons to embarrass then George W Bush who belonged to a different political party:

Back in 2007, Assad primarily restricted his murderous tendencies to killing US military personnel in Iraq and Israeli civilians, with the occasional Lebanese Prime Minister thrown in for good measure. Assad has subsequently expanded his repertoire to include Syrian civilians and Turkish military pilots.



Of course, Neo-Cons and Right-Wingers were dismissive of Rep Pelosi's effusive pronouncement:

"We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace," Ms. Pelosi grandly declared.

However, even the Left-Wing, Establishment Washington Post who usually rubber stamps everything that Nancy Pelosi's Democrat Party says and does looked askance at Pelosi's actions and verbally reprimanded her:

Never mind that that statement is ludicrous: As any diplomat with knowledge of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to criticize in Mr. Bush's military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms. Pelosi's attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish.

Hence, it's not surprising that Rep Pelosi is currently defending a US administration policy that gave assault weapons to Mexican drug cartels which resulted in the murder of hundreds of Mexican nationals and at least two US border agents in Fast and Furious.

Pelosi, let me count the ways thou art annoying..

Nancy Pelosi helpfully enumerates the various reasons why her political opponents find her to be annoying:

If you can't win on policy, then you go to process. If you can't win on process, then you go to personality. And that's how they have decided they would make up stories about me and the rest

The only point of editing that I would offer is that it's possible to multitask and dislike her on all three accounts simultaneously in parallel versus sequentially in series.

What stories are Pelosi's polticial opponents "making up" about her? The fact that she abuses the privilege of USAF flights for boondoggle trips?


The speaker doth protest too much:

There seems to -- some people think there seems to be a market for saying that I am very partisan, and that I don't give the Republicans their opportunity. That simply is not true.

No, she's not very partisan. She is the most partisan member of the House since Preston Brooks .

He was attacked on the Senate floor by pro-slavery Democratic congressman, Preston Brooks, who stormed the Senate side of the Capitol and tried to beat Sumner to death with his cane because he dared to introduce yet another piece of anti-slavery legislation.

HillBuzz engages in more Pelosi mockery:

Nancy Pelosi has claimed, “I am not partisan” in a recent interview.

Here are a few other things Pelosi can claim not to be with equal credulity:

“I am not a terrible author who writes books that can only be described as skunk-juice-drenched.”

“I am not someone who wears far too much makeup and believes lipstick should go around the lips, not on them.”

Obama/Pelosi/Reid debt bill

Conservative blogs have been fishing for an alternative name to the so called stimulus package. The Corner suggested OPR debt bill. I would suggest a minor modification to the acronym to Pelosi/Obama/Reid aka POR debt bill.