American Leftists Hate America and Support America 's Enemies

 

Few clips from the old PBS Charlie Rose show before he was fired for having his robe open and his dingle dangle hanging out🥋

1 Leftists point blank admit $ Obama gave in nuke deal went to Iranian military imperialism

2 Democrat Media Complex respects privacy of Iranian mullahs pic.twitter.com/pVmj3zjern

— 🎼AdagioForStrings🎻 (@adagioforstring) August 22, 2020

Then American totalitarian leftists who only support "free speech" that agrees with their narrative & want to suppress everyone who disagrees with them as engaging in "hate speech" have no self awareness when Turkey 's dictator Erdogan does the same thing pic.twitter.com/M6KOVQUJGQ

— 🎼AdagioForStrings🎻 (@adagioforstring) August 22, 2020

Charlie Rose interviewed Enrique Pena Nieto, President of Mexico

On Charlie Rose 6/29/2014 show, the president of Mexico bragged about how wealthy his country is and how NAFTA helped US companies export factories and jobs South of the border:


Indeed, contradicting the condescending stereotype many from the US harbor about our neighbor to the South, that everyone from Mexico lives in a hut with a goat, Carlos Slim Helu is the second wealthiest man in the world, as documented by Forbes with a net worth of $74.1 Billion. Indeed, when I googled for "Mexican millionaire Slim" I was snarkily corrected with "Mexican BILLIONAIRE Slim":

I don't believe it's purely a coincidence there's been a growing chasm between rich and poor with US middle class taking it on the chin since Clinton and NAFTA

.@MattButlerUSA Notice from .@politico chart how income inequality skyrocketed under NAFTA & Bill Clinton in 1992 #p2 pic.twitter.com/3R7iKffGVw
— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) July 4, 2014

However, Nieto didn't explain that if children of Conquistadors are rolling in dough, why they can't take care of their own poor people vs fobbing them off on the USA:

Not unexpectedly, the unofficial organ of Communist propaganda, The Nation, seems to think that Mexico, even though they are getting American jobs and forcing us to pay their poor people, somehow is getting the short end of the stick, from John M. Ackerman May 22, 2014 article : "How Mexico’s New President Is Turning His Country Into a Servile US Client" Fisking his stupid article:

"President Barack Obama has not only failed to achieve comprehensive immigration reform [ aka amnesty and open border] , but he has also actively participated in the dismantling of development and democracy in Mexico, thehomeland for two-thirds of US Latinos [ if USA does NOT represent the homeland of US Latinos, why don't they return to their supposed homeland? -- see tweet below or Sharla's Labyrinth's more pointed blog post]  Obama’s policy toward Mexico builds on the long tradition of US support for neoliberal authoritarian regimes in Latin America. Just as Washington actively encouraged military coups in South America during the 1970s and armed the dictators of Central America during the 1980s [ vs dictators that Communist USSR armed and funded]  , today it props up Mexico’s corrupt political class as it slowly tears the country apart [ actually narco terrorists are tearing Mexico apart as per usual]"

If you're rooting for another country in the #WorldCup, you should move there #USA
— the real alexbello (@RealAlexBello) July 1, 2014

 

Hagel ignores #minordetail sequestration = Obama 's idea

Democrat meme tries to blame Veterans Administration scandal on GOP budget:

REAL #VAScandal: In 2012 & 2014 GOP Cut Vet Benefits As More Vets Die From Suicide Than Combat http://t.co/iBwlePepi9 pic.twitter.com/dPAQUe82AX
— The Baxter Bean (@TheBaxterBean) May 22, 2014

Ignoring minor detail budget restraints were from sequester and bipartisan budget agreements:

@maritzasolito @2111015 "When Senate Democrats decided to move the bill to House floor, it caught....VFW off guard" http://t.co/cW6NdAdbFY
— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) May 23, 2014

Hagel the RINO DoD Secretary:

"@ReaganiteGOPer: Hump-Day Humor... http://t.co/eQ8hVfkpGe pic.twitter.com/pOSjjXHm5T"Hagel kind of looks like Sgt Snorkel, too!!!
— @Curt Golden (@curtandnan) February 26, 2014

slagged off the sequester on Charlies Rose 5/23/2014, ignoring fact that the sequester was Obama's idea:

3-Pinnochios-Obama his idea cut vaccines then blames sequester http://t.co/i9pP1EAXTz
— Sandy (@badov49) March 10, 2013

 implying, instead, that it was a GOP idea:

 

Conversely, I think the most "mindless action" I've seen are voters electing this RINO to Congress.

Additionally, Hagel carries on the Obama tradition of fighting straw men:

Hagel says it's false to compare current US troop levels to WWII levels b/c we have technological force multipliers, ignoring the other minor detail that our enemies have also invested in technological force multipliers:

Presumably, Hagel got his advice from Motley Fool 1/25/2014 article "Should the U.S. Army Lay Off 100,000 Soldiers?", written by Rich Smith, who never served in the US military and spent his career as an international lawyer in Russia:

"only about 16% of soldiers in the military actually "fight" our wars. The rest of the 1.4 million servicemen and -women serve primarily in supporting roles -- transporting supplies, maintaining vehicles, evaluating intelligence"

Good luck fighting wars w/o logistics and/or intel. Smith goes on to say that all our wars will be fought by robots. Idiot.

It's basic arithmetic. If the US and its opponents have technological parity, but our opponents have numerical superiority, then our opponents win. Communist Chinese were able to overrun US positions in Korean War thru shear numbers vs technological superiority.

 

 

I love the Chinese condescension in this clip that the US fought w/Chinese vs Japan during WWII. China was the France of Asia who surrendered quickly and collaborated complicitly with the fascists during the war but engage in revisionist history afterwards to pretend they won on their own. What is still perplexing to me, is why China didn't bother to fight the Japanese during WWII when Japan actually occupied China. However, a few years later, China motivates itself to fight vs US in Korea w/only their imagined threat that US MIGHT invade China.

Charlie Rose NPR voice vs Iranian nuke program apologist

Family Guy goofed on annoying faux soothing NPR voice:




and, not as surprisingly, Alex Jones, infowars guy, also goofed on NPR:




Charlie Rose, just being himself, seriously used his stupid NPR voice whilst listening to some Iranian mullah apologist try to justify the Holocaust denying nation acquisition of nuclear weapons on his 1/9/2014 show:

I have to compliment the Iranian dude, tho. He was able to simultaneously slag off Israel's right to exist without actually mentioning Israel by name, treating it like a Hogwarts student does "He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" Lord Voldemort.

So even tho this tweet is probably a just joke:

Neckties are symbol of West's victory over Ottoman Empire. Ergo, casual Friday (+ @markos on TV) = Muslim plot http://bit.ly/ax7xJG
— M.S. Bellows, Jr. (@msbellows) September 17, 2010

notice how the Iranian Ambassador refuses to wear a necktie, presumably, because he disagrees with liberal imam from Islam Today and believes that neckties really are a tool of the evil Christian Great Satan Haberdashers:

Question

Some people say that it is unlawful for Muslim men to wear neckties, since they claim that the necktie has its origins in Christian religious traditions and that it symbolizes the cross. On the other hand, there are people who say that a Muslim man can even wear silk neckties - though silk is forbidden for men - because the tie is not actually worn directly on the body. What is the correct ruling on men's neckties?

Answered by

Sheikh Salman al-Oadah

I do not see anything wrong with Muslim men wearing neckties, because the necktie is no longer a distinguishing mode of dress for the unbelievers. It is now a part of the Muslims’ dress in many Muslim countries like Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and Morocco...etc. Therefore, the purpose of forbidding it does not exist. Even if it is something that originated among non-Muslims, anything that becomes global ceases to belong to any specific civilization.

It is not permissible for men to wear a necktie made of silk. Silk is forbidden for men, whether worn direct on the body, around the neck, or over the head. All of these are different ways of wearing something.

The Prophet (peace be upon him) took a piece of silk in his right hand and a piece of gold in his left, held them aloft, and said: “These are forbidden for the men of my people and permitted for the women.” [Sunan Ibn Mâjah]

Patton got fired from his job in post WWII Germany after comparing Nazis to Democrats and Republicans:





but Charlie Rose still keeps his 10 million jobs after comparing the Iranian theocracy to Western democracies:

 

ICYMI, all the candidates in an Iranian "election" are per-screened by their theocratic mullahs, so Charlie Rose's analogy is just completely absurd.

And, finally, from Captain Obvious:

#CaptainObvious Once Kerry signs faux "nuke deal" with Iran - Look for Israel to be pressured to disarm. http://t.co/6gEkCxfQYZ
— Tom T. (@VRWCTexan) April 26, 2014

Charlie Rose Islamo-Fascist Apologist

Charlie Rose on 1/8/14 show interviewed Iranian UN Ambassador and compared Iranian theocracy to US democracy:




Comparing US political parties to fascist factions got General George Patton reassigned:

Gen. George S. Patton tells reporters that he does not see the need for "this denazification thing" and compares the controversy over Nazism to a "Democratic and Republican election fight."

Patton had many gifts, but diplomacy was not one of them. After the war, while stationed in Germany, he criticized the process of denazification, or the removal of former Nazi party members from positions of political, administrative, and governmental power, probably out of naivete more than anything else. Nevertheless, his impolitic press statements questioning the policy resulted in Eisenhower's removing him as U.S. commander in Bavaria. He was transferred to the 15th Army Group.

Seems Charlie Rose is equally impolitic, as far as US national interests are concerned, in promoting moral equivalency between US secular democracy and Iran's theocracy. Would Charlie Rose like a US system where Pat Robertson vetoes candidates is US elections like the Shia mullahs in their Guardian Council do in Iran?