Fortnight For Freedom is scheduled to run from June 21 - Jul 4
Religious people bring society an emphasis on strong families! #Fortnight4Freedom day 8 here: http://t.co/u0lmW720E5 pic.twitter.com/8ZcCxBXg8z— Phoenix Diocese (@PhoenixDiocese) June 28, 2015
And concludes with a televised mass on Saturday July 4, 2015
Be sure to join us on Saturday at 12pm ET for the #fortnight4freedom Closing Mass | http://t.co/jPo2Zjw3yl pic.twitter.com/QzoRXsU6xS— CatholicTV (@CatholicTV) June 30, 2015
The start date coincided with the eve of both Saint Thomas More and John Fisher Feast Days i.e. the day they were executed. It seems US Council of Catholic Bishops hedged its bets with a possibly unorthodox Christian humanist philosopher inspired by the even bigger unorthodox Erasmus by celebrating both More and Fisher, the latter clearly a Catholic martyr.
Kind of weird that both left wing radicals & the Vatican claim Thomas More as their own #Fortnight4Freedom https://t.co/2THZX8R4ta— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 23, 2015
It looks like Thomas More
might be Dudley Moore's long lost cousin, since there appears a distinct family resemblance:
and they both appear to have had run ins with the law. Father Jerabek's Blog April 22, 2014 post "St. Thomas More: His Cell and His Tomb" includes photos of Thomas More's Tower of London prison cell:
And Dudley had his mug shot snapped by the Los Angeles Police:
Harriet Lessy wrote a breathtakingly unPC March 23, 1994 article with the most horrible pun in poor taste title "DUDLEY MOORE STARS IN HIT DRAMA" in which she downplays Moore's domestic violence arrest:
No laughs coming from the home of Brit comic/actor Dudley Moore.
Moore, 58, who was taken into custody Monday night by L.A. police, was booked on suspicion of domestic violence. He walked after posting $50,000 bail.
The fuzz apparently heard from the actor first. The star of "10," ''Arthur" and "Foul Play" (no kidding) called to report a domestic dispute at his home in the burbs.
Then the cops heard from his girlfriend, who told them the pint-sized actor ''had just battered her."
LAPD sped to the scene and found the unidentified woman suffering "visible trauma to the neck area." Moore was invited to take a ride to L.A.'s version of the Roundhouse.
Now Moore, who also lists "Best Defense" in his film credits, may need a defense lawyer. He faces a possible cohabitational abuse charge. If that charge sticks, the 1981 Academy Award nominee will be looking at a potential sentence of four years in the slammer and up to $6,000 in fines.
It seems Ms. Lessy is a gay rights advocate from Michael Alan Goldberg "Philadelphia Weekly" Apr. 27, 2011 article: "Boy Scouts Panel at Equality Forum: Gay-rights activist Harriet Lessy discusses the decision to allow the Boy Scouts to retain the use of city property"
So, Ms Lessy supports gay men's rights, but not the rights of straight women not to be physically assaulted by men. Guess Ms Lessy is a femalephobe.
However, if there is thespian connection, it appears that Thomas More was the Bette Davis of Tudor England, since the poor fellow, or at least his character in "A Man For All Seasons" experienced a similar fate to Bette Davis' Margo Channing in "All About Eve"
"An ingenue [ Eve Harrington ] insinuates herself in to the company of an established but aging stage actress and her circle of theater friends."
Further off topic, allegedly Claudette Colbert instead of Davis was supposed to play the lead role, which would've been a different movie altogether, from "Stardust: The Bette Davis Story":
Thomas More's Eve Harrington was the character named Richard Rich, and it always annoyed me that the Rich character wasn't held accountable during his lifetime for his treacherous treatment of More.
Counterpoint to More. MT @adagioforstring: Rather annoying that weasely Richard Rich didn't get his comeuppance on earth. #AManForAllSeasons— Steven D. Greydanus (@DecentFilms) August 17, 2013
More loses everything to preserve his self, his soul. Rich forfeits his soul, not for the whole world, but for Wales. @adagioforstring— Steven D. Greydanus (@DecentFilms) August 17, 2013
Comeuppance in this life for Rich wouldn't test/examine More's attitude toward this-worldly consequences in the same way. @adagioforstring— Steven D. Greydanus (@DecentFilms) August 17, 2013
Back to St. Thomas More .... "America Needs Fatima" JUNE 22, 2013 blog post "St. Thomas More – He Confronted the Mandate" goes into rather gruesome detail about the final disposition of poor St. More's remains. More was beheaded:
"The head, after being parboiled, was exposed on London Bridge for a month when [ Thomas More's daughter] Margaret Roper bribed the man, whose business it was to throw it into the river, to give it to her instead. The final fate of the relic is somewhat uncertain, but in 1824 a leaden box was found in the Roper vault at St. Dunstan’s, Canterbury, which on being opened was found to contain a head presumed to be More’s."
However, from THE CENTER FOR THOMAS MORE STUDIES Thomas More's body was buried at the Tower of London:
There still seems to be a raging literary controversy as to whether More's magnum opus, "Utopia", was a serious proposition blueprint for society in the vein of Karl Marx "Das Kapital", or simply a satirical commentary in the style of Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal." The controversy might explain why it took More so long to become saint (but not as long as poor Bede tho):
@NWcarol28 @bombaylychee @BBCiPlayer Maybe literary controversy is why it took until 1935 for Thomas More sainthood pic.twitter.com/l6RHUIfnc2— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 22, 2015
And a Thomas More quote possibly pertinent to Obama:
@NWcarol28 This quote seems to apply to Obama "if any king were ... so behated by his subjects" pic.twitter.com/CMrL48yhQf— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 23, 2015
Mark Levin dislikes big state authoritarianism described in More's "Utopia", and works along the premise that More was sincere vs satirical in his fictional writing:
.@NWcarol28 #MarkLevin didn't like Thomas More 's Utopia & thus named his book Ameritopia http://t.co/IAXtozxWgp pic.twitter.com/UVVc2UnMJt— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 23, 2015
Aha I'm not surprised the founder of the Democrat party has a copy of Thomas More 's dystopian Utopia https://t.co/lO8jL3tViW— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 23, 2015
From Dick Morris on February 8, 2012 "Book Review Of Ameritopia By Mark Levin"
"Broadly, [Mark Levin] divides them into two camps: Utopians and Libertarians. He explains how utopians laid the basis for modern socialism, leftism, and Obamaism and how the libertarian (he calls it Americanism) enlightenment philosophers set the stage for modern conservatism and free market economics.
His most important intellectual contribution is to identify the search for utopia — the perfect world — with the politics of the left. From Plato’s Republic through Sir Thomas Moore’s Utopia and Hobbes’ Leviathan and Marx’ Communist manifesto the storyline is the same: A super-lawgiver brings about a transformation of our flawed society into a perfect world. To Plato the superhero is the philosopher-king. To Moore it is King Utopus. To Hobbes it is the super dictator/strong man. To Marx it is the working class dictatorship. But the formulations are all the same – a big strong man saves the world. No democracy needed here. All we need is the right man in charge."
Allegedly More liked bunnies in "Masterpiece Theater" "Wolf Hall" film:
The rabbit-loving Thomas More depicted in WOLF HALL *almost* makes me enthusiastic to lecture on Utopia at 9am. pic.twitter.com/qkhuFOERAf— Rachel Sykes (@rachelizasykes) February 1, 2015
.@rachelizasykes Did Thomas More support the eating of hasenpfeffer in his Utopia ? pic.twitter.com/k40ahCrnjQ— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 22, 2015
The hasenpfeffer reference was a h/t in a 6 degrees of separation kind of way to Henry VIII. "Hasenpfeffer" is a frequent exclamation in the Bugs Bunny cartoon "Shishkabugs" in a mashup with Men Without Hats' "Safety Dance":
and the original unedited cartoon:
The fat spoiled king in the Bugs Bunny cartoon was based on Charles Laughton's portrayal in "The Private Life of Henry VIII":
I suspect Henry VIII, the abusive narcissist who murdered his wives, is misogynist Harriet Lessy's favorite monarch.
A Protestant, but non Anglican -- so still an outsider, Faraday, admired More:
First ed of Thomas More’s Utopia, 1551, owned and rebound by Faraday, complete with his name sticker #flyleafFriday pic.twitter.com/SSQfCHuZtY— Ri_Science (@Ri_Science) October 24, 2014
.@Ri_Science Faraday exemplified benefits of networking getting a job after giving Davy a book http://t.co/YNeDstugU3 pic.twitter.com/j02a00Xwuk— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 23, 2015
More's "Utopia" promoted learning and scholarship, which bookbinder cum scientist Faraday would appreciate:
"Even the Syphogrants, though excused by the law, yet do not excuse themselves, but work, that by their examples they may excite the industry of the rest of the people; the like exemption is allowed to those who, being recommended to the people by the priests, are, by the secret suffrages of the Syphogrants, privileged from labour, that they may apply themselves wholly to study; and if any of these fall short of those hopes that they seemed at first to give, they are obliged to return to work; and sometimes a mechanic that so employs his leisure hours as to make a considerable advancement in learning is eased from being a tradesman and ranked among their learned men. Out of these they choose their ambassadors, their priests, their Tranibors, and the Prince himself, anciently called their Barzenes, but is called of late their Ademus."
Hence, I believe he and his Utopian hosts would turn a jaundiced eye to overdue library books, especially since they originally only wrote on tree bark before More's character introduced them to printing presses:
"The minds of the Utopians, when fenced with a love for learning, are very ingenious in discovering all such arts as are necessary to carry it to perfection. Two things they owe to us, the manufacture of paper and the art of printing; yet they are not so entirely indebted to us for these discoveries but that a great part of the invention was their own. We showed them some books printed by Aldus, we explained to them the way of making paper and the mystery of printing; but, as we had never practised these arts, we described them in a crude and superficial manner. They seized the hints we gave them; and though at first they could not arrive at perfection, yet by making many essays they at last found out and corrected all their errors and conquered every difficulty. Before this they only wrote on parchment, on reeds, or on the barks of trees; but now they have established the manufactures of paper and set up printing presses"
Took Sir Thomas More's "Utopia" from the family bookshelf for my flight. A hefty late fee is on the horizon. 1981?!?! pic.twitter.com/QsO3gg6hXv— Bobby Goepfert (@GeffMan47) July 26, 2014
Not certain More's philosophy on police, but according to Cliff Notes, More's Utopia had no police, which is prescient of poor More considering the coppers threw him in the clink:
"The extraordinary efficiency of the entire business structure is explained in part by superior management, as has been said, but also partly because they have eliminated several costly and time-consuming activities, freeing the citizens for more productive work. There is no army, no navy, no police force; there are no lawyers, bankers, or salesmen."
.@GeffMan47 You're luck the Library of Congress Police dissolved in 2009 o/w you might end up in the hoosegow pic.twitter.com/uve4yvNGrT— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 23, 2015
More was presciently ahead of his time:
Map of Thomas More's Utopia by Ortelius (circa 1595) pic.twitter.com/6hB9RfnBEp— Imaginary Cities (@Oniropolis) May 9, 2014
.@marialenacarr @Oniropolis Thomas More was ahead his time w/ prototype Pacman = monster & 4 ships = 4 ghosts pic.twitter.com/cCFGjNZd1j— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) June 23, 2015
From short bio in Whiting, Bartlett Jere, Fred Millett, Alexander Witherspoon, Odell Shepard, Arthur Hudson, Edward Wagenknecht, and Louis Untermeyer. The College Survey of English Literature. Shorter ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1942. Print. More considered becoming monk, but instead entered secular public political world and ended up a martyr and a saint:
Unlike Levin's critique of More's supposed ideology, Whiting et al attack More's aesthetics: "although attempts have been made, especially by R.W. Chambers, to establish More as the first modern prose stylist, most readers find his prose formless and undisciplined and his controversial manners the equal of Milton's worst." Since my writing resembles that remark, I'm going to give More the benefit of the doubt.
Conversely, St. Francis Assisi, whose parents wanted him to become a soldier and a statesman, disappointed his family when he opted to become an impoverished monk. I wonder if Francis and Thomas had chosen the proverbial Robert Frost path less trodden opposite professions whether either would have been beatified. According to biography.com article on St. Francis, he successfully survived his stint in the slammer, unlike poor Thomas More:
"After fighting in a battle between Assisi and Perugia, Francis was captured and imprisoned for ransom. He spent nearly a year in prison—awaiting his father's payment—and, according to legend, began receiving visions from God. "
Whiting et al don't settle the dispute as to whether More was serious or not, but point out "there is certainly no psychological incongruity between the regimented society of Utopia and More's severe, ascetic practices."
A more sympathetic portrait of More as a laid back Christian humanist is limned in Burns, Edward McNall, Robert E. Lerner, and Standish Meacham. Western Civilizations: Their History and Their Culture. 10th ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 1984. Print. with coffee mug stained cover:
Burns et al paint More and his Christian humanist mentor Erasmus as laid back "basically conciliatory in their temperaments [who] preferred to express themselves by mean of wry understatements" in distinct contrast to how poor More was portrayed by the PBS "Wolf Hall"
Tappan, E. (1905). A Short History of England's Literature. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton, Mifflin and Company. is also sympathetic to More and describes More and Tyndale as "two of the three or four best writers of English prose that during [Henry VIII's] reign"
I quoted from Tappan to counter the mean anti - More (must be an Anglican) snarkiness:
.@bombaylychee @BBCiPlayer Thomas More was funny & witty but only in Latin - perhaps humor lost in translation pic.twitter.com/oC4Tfm5Vgp— Bossy Adagio (@adagioforstring) July 2, 2015
Woods, G., Watt, H., Anderson, G., and; Holznecht, K. (1958). The Literature of England: An Anthology and a History (Fourth ed., Vol. One). Chicago, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company challenges Tappan's assertion and questions whether More really did write "The History of Edward V and Richard III". Woods also disabuses readers of Tappan's implication that the creator of freethinking Utopians was simpatico with Tyndale by pointing out More wrote tracts critical of the translator of the English Bible.
More's reputation is defended by, of all sources, the British leftist "Guardian" newspaper in Jonathan Jones' 29 January 2015 article "'Wolf Hall' is wrong: Thomas More was a funny, feminist Renaissance man"
"Why does 'Wolf Hall' demonise one of the most brilliant and forward-looking of all Renaissance people? Its caricature of Thomas More as a charmless prig, a humourless alienating nasty piece of work, is incredibly unfair...He was a literary wit, a family man ... and a proto-feminist."
With a quick screen save summary:
Conversely, a youtube commenter pointed out another reason that might have held up More's canonization, he allegedly tortured people:
More might curmudgeonly counter Mossy McSharry from his 1534 "A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation"
"And would God that those that drown themselves in the desire of this world's wretched wealth, were not yet more fools than he! But alas, their folly as far surpasseth the foolishness of that silly fellow as there is difference between the height of heaven and the very depth of hell. For our Saviour saith, "Woe may you be that laugh now, for you shall wail and weep." And "There is a time of weeping," saith the scripture, "and there is a time of laughing." But, as you see, he setteth the weeping time before, for that is the time of this wretched world, and the laughing time shall come after in heaven. There is also a time of sowing and a time of reaping, too. Now must we in this world sow, that we may in the other world reap. And in this short sowing time of this weeping world, must we water our seed with the showers of our tears. And then shall we have in heaven a merry laughing harvest forever. "They went forth and sowed their seeds weeping," saith the prophet. But what, saith he, shall follow thereof? "They shall come again more than laughing, with great joy and exultation, with their handfuls of corn in their hands." Lo, they that in their going home towards heaven sow their seeds with weeping, shall at the day of judgment come to their bodies again with everlasting plentiful laughing. And to prove that this life is no laughing time, but rather the time of weeping, we find that our Saviour himself wept twice or thrice, but never find we that he laughed so much as once. I will not swear that he never did, but at least he left us no example of it. But on the other hand, he left us example of weeping.
Of weeping have we matter enough, both for our own sins and for other folk's, too. For surely so should we do—bewail their wretched sins, and not be glad to detract them nor envy them either. Alas, poor souls, what cause is there to envy them who are ever wealthy in this world, and ever out of tribulation? Of them Job saith, "They lead all their days in wealth, and in a moment of an hour descend into their graves and are painfully buried in hell." St. Paul saith unto the Hebrews that those whom God loveth he chastiseth, "And he scourgeth every son of his that he receiveth." St. Paul saith also, "By many tribulations must we go into the kingdom of God." And no marvel, for our Saviour Christ said of himself unto his two disciples that were going into the village of Emaus, "Know you not that Christ must suffer and so go into his kingdom?" And would we who are servants look for more privilege in our master's house than our master himself?"
FYI, More was paraphrasing Psalm 126:6 in his treatise:
"Those who go out weeping, carrying seed to sow, will return with songs of joy, carrying sheaves with them."
Which reminds me of Don McLean's "Babylon"
which is based on English Standard Version translation of Psalm 137:1:
"By the waters of Babylon, there we sat down and wept, when we remembered Zion."which, of course, if More had completely succeeded over Tyndale, neither the English Bible nor McLean's song would exist...but I'll give More the last word: